Senior Living

/

Health

/

ArcaMax

What could the election mean for Social Security and Medicare?

Erin Bendig, Kiplinger’s Consumer News Service on

Published in Senior Living

As the presidential election nears, Social Security and Medicare are at the forefront of many American’s minds. Americans’ top priority for the President and Congress is to address Social Security’s funding shortfalls to help people have a financially secure retirement, according to a study from the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies.

This makes sense, considering the Social Security trust fund is projected to become insolvent in 2035. Medicare’s hospital insurance benefits are expected to run out of money in 2036.

More than 66 million people in the United States receive health care coverage through Medicare. As of June 30, 2024 (the most-recently available data), nearly nine out of 10 people age 65 and older were receiving a Social Security benefit. Social Security benefits represent about 30% of the income of people over age 65.

Here’s what the upcoming election could mean for both Social Security and Medicare.

Harris on Social Security and Medicare

Harris strongly supports Social Security and opposes any plan that would reduce or cut Social Security benefits. In August, she wrote on Facebook that if elected President, she would work to “protect and expand” Social Security benefits, claiming they’ve “made the difference between poverty or peace of mind for millions of seniors, people with disabilities, and other beneficiaries.”

According to the official policy proposal, Vice President Harris is committed to strengthening and protecting Social Security and Medicare. For one, she plans on making corporations and the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share in taxes to keep Social Security and Medicare solvent in the long run.

Additionally, Harris will expand savings on prescription drugs for all Americans by President by extending Medicare’s $35 monthly cap on insulin and the $2,000 annual cap on prescription drugs, initially implemented by the Inflation Reduction Act, to all Americans, as well as accelerate Medicare drug price negotiations to cover more drugs and lower prices faster.

The Harris-Walz Administration will also build on the Butch Lewis Act and protect millions of union pensions.

Read our article, Harris’ Stances on Social Security and Medicare, to learn more.

Trump on Social Security and Medicare

According to Trump’s campaign platform, the administration says it will “fight for and protect Social Security and Medicare with no cuts, including no changes to the retirement age.” Trump has also proposed cutting taxes on Social Security, but that could potentially cause more harm than good. Entirely exempting taxes on Social Security benefits could drive the program into insolvency even faster, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

 

While in office, Trump made no significant progress in remedying Social Security and Medicare’s funding issues. Each of his yearly federal budgets proposed cuts in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, primarily in reduced payments to healthcare providers and hospitals.

Additionally, in October 2019, then-President Trump published the Executive Order on Protecting and Improving Medicare for Our Nation’s Seniors, which included an overhaul of the Medicare for All program.

Read our article, Trump’s Stances on Social Security and Medicare, to learn more.

Impact of the election on Social Security and Medicare

Significant Medicare and Social Security changes are “unlikely without strong congressional support,” said Mark Friedlich (VP, US Government Affairs, Tax & Accounting North America at Wolters Kluwer).

“If Harris wins, expanding Social Security and Medicare benefits is possible but would likely face opposition in a divided Congress,” he said. “Significant cuts to Social Security and Medicare are unlikely if Trump wins, given his campaign promises. Some reforms to reduce ‘waste’ or ‘bad management’ might be proposed, but sweeping changes would face opposition.”

Bottom line

Both candidates support Social Security and Medicare but have different approaches to protecting these programs. Harris plans to make corporations and the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share in taxes to keep Social Security and Medicare solvent in the long run, while Trump, on the other hand, has proposed cutting taxes on Social Security altogether.

However, Congressional gridlock could prevent major changes to these programs. The makeup of Congress will ultimately determine any changes to Social Security and Medicare, as significant reforms would need bipartisan support.

©2024 The Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc. All rights reserved. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

Ask Amy

Ask Amy

By Amy Dickinson
Asking Eric

Asking Eric

By R. Eric Thomas
Billy Graham

Billy Graham

By Billy Graham
Chuck Norris

Chuck Norris

By Chuck Norris
Dear Abby

Dear Abby

By Abigail Van Buren
Dear Annie

Dear Annie

By Annie Lane
Dr. Michael Roizen

Dr. Michael Roizen

By Dr. Michael Roizen
God Squad

God Squad

By Rabbi Marc Gellman
Keith Roach

Keith Roach

By Keith Roach, M.D.
Miss Manners

Miss Manners

By Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin
My So-Called Millienial Life

My So-Called Millienial Life

By Cassie McClure
Positive Aging

Positive Aging

By Marilyn Murray Willison
Scott LaFee

Scott LaFee

By Scott LaFee
Sense & Sensitivity

Sense & Sensitivity

By Harriette Cole
Single File

Single File

By Susan Dietz
Social Security and You

Social Security and You

By Tom Margenau
Toni Says

Toni Says

By Toni King

Comics

Steve Benson Dave Whamond Clay Bennett Breaking Cat News Adam Zyglis Daryl Cagle