Current News

/

ArcaMax

Key oversight officials leave as LAPD searches for chief

Libor Jany, Los Angeles Times on

Published in News & Features

A former small-town police chief who spent the past 20 years overseeing the commission — far longer than all of his predecessors in the role — Tefank was named the commission's director after having serving as top cop in the cities of Buena Park and Pomona. He was fired from the latter job over what he said was his refusal to remove officers because he felt doing so violated their due process rights.

Tefank started at a particularly challenging stage for the LAPD. Only 18 months prior, the long-troubled department had entered into a federal consent decree that forced scores of changes overseen by a monitor and a federal judge. For the next two decades, his earnest, raspy voice and wispy white hair were fixtures at commission meetings.

In an interview Monday, Tefank said he was proud of what he'd accomplished over a 55-year career in law enforcement. As executive director he said he had a front row seat to the post-Rampart transformation of the department, from one that had been historically fiercely opposed to outside influence to one that grudgingly embraced change.

Despite its continued challenges, including significant staffing shortages, Tefank says he thinks the department is headed in the right direction.

"I would hope my legacy is that I served the commissioners — all 28 of them that I worked for — well, I served the department well, and I served the public well, that I balanced all those three areas," he said.

Shortcomings in the oversight of the LAPD have been documented in countless official reports since the 1960s, and critics say the five-member Police Commission still lacks teeth. It can order policies changed and has the ability to recommend the firing of a police chief — or decide whether to bring one back for a second term — but it has next to no say in the department's day-to-day operations. The inspector general's office is responsible for conducting audits and studies, but only at the commission's request.

"The problem is that the police commission may be doing more ... but it still doesn't have the ultimate authority to make systemic changes," said Chaleff, the former commission president.

Each week, the commission's meetings at LAPD headquarters are filled with frustrated critics activists and residents who lament what they see as the oversight panel's unwillingness to stand up to the police department in meaningful ways.

Tefank pushed back on what he called "a false perception" about the commission's cozy relationship with the LAPD. He said that taking a more "adversarial role," as some critics would like, would make it harder to build support for new policies. "I challenged the department when I thought it was appropriate, and also quite frankly I challenged the commissioners when I thought it was appropriate," he said.

 

Former LAPD Chief William J. Bratton said that when he set out to remake the department on the heels of the Rampart scandal he found a willing partner in Tefank, whom he remembered for his expansive knowledge of policing, "very congenial" personality and work ethic.

"It's very important that the police chief get along with the Police Commission," Bratton said, "and in order to make that work you need an executive director who has the ability to build a bridge between the two."

By the time he retired, Tefank held considerable sway over the commission. As director, he set meeting agendas to clear the path for certain issues or projects. He was also responsible for choosing the hearing examiners who sit on the panels that decide whether officers should face discipline or termination.

Police Commission member William Briggs called Tefank one of the department's "unsung heroes." Briggs, said that, like himself, most commissioners don't come from law enforcement backgrounds and so relied on Tefank's institutional knowledge for advice in creating new policies or scuttling old ones.

"Mr. Tefank guided us and steered us, not only through a department that very few of have familiarity with," said Briggs, an entertainment lawyer. "He is our eyes and ears to what is happening in the department on a daily basis."

Briggs, who spoke prior to Smith's departure for Portland, said the recent vacancies have given the department and the city something of a clean slate.

"This is the start of a new chapter for law enforcement and the city of Los Angeles," he said, "one that would take us into the next century of policing."

_____


©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus