Do Americans have the right to not practice religion?

When the question is phrased like that, even most fervent religious believers out there would likely concede that, yes, non-belief (like belief itself) must qualify as a fundamental American right.

Yet that right is under frontal attack today, from a religiously driven political movement operating under the premise that if government doesn’t promote religion, it is by definition attacking it.

That premise is not only backward, but is a slippery slope toward theocracy. The latest slide comes in Louisiana, with a new law requiring that every public school and college post the Ten Commandments in every classroom.

Republican Gov. Jeff Landry signed the law Wednesday. It makes his state the first to test the Constitution’s church-state separation in this manner since a U.S. Supreme Court opinion in 1980 that found a Kentucky requirement to display the commandments in public schools violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment.

That clause is unambiguous: Congress (and, by extension, the states) “shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” The trendy narrative among religious conservatives today that church-state separation is a myth only works if you ignore the very first words of the very first amendment in the Bill of Rights.

As clear as that seems, it won’t necessarily be clear to today’s radical-right Supreme Court. The conservative majority in 2022 upheld a public high school football coach’s right to pray on the school’s football field after games and invite his players to join him. The ruling brushed off the obvious implied pressure the coach created on his players to pray.

The Louisiana law goes beyond merely implied pressure: Every student attending publicly funded schools in the state will literally be a captive audience to a religious doctrine specific to Judeo-Christian faith. The new law even sets minimum dimensions for the commandment displays (11 by 14 inches) and mandates that they must be “in a large, easily readable font.”

That slippery slope we mentioned? This is what it looks like.

Defenders of the new law maintain that the commandments aren’t solely a religious statement but a historical document of cultural principles ingrained in the laws of America and elsewhere over the ages.

That may apply to some of the commandments — the prohibitions on murder, theft and false witness, for example.

But what is an adherent to polytheist religions like Hinduism or Buddhism supposed to do with “Thou shalt have no other gods before me”? And what is an atheist supposed to do with any of it?

In fact, even many of the Judeo-Christian faithful may discover that with this law, Louisiana officially relegates their beliefs to secondary status as well. The law specifies wording that religious scholars say generally represents a Protestant version of the commandments — a version distinct from those recognized by Catholics and Jews.

What is it that business conservatives always say about the free market? The government isn’t supposed to pick winners and losers? Shouldn’t something as complex and personal as faith have at least that level of insulation from government?

Allowing the religious beliefs of a few to dictate public policy for everyone creates dangers that go beyond the merely philosophical.

The bluntly religious basis for Missouri’s draconian abortion ban, for example, is obvious right there in its statutory language (“Almighty God is the author of life”) as well as in transcripts of the sermon-like legislative floor debate that preceded it.

A Missouri court’s baffling ruling this month that the law doesn’t improperly enshrine religious doctrine will be of little comfort to traumatized rape victims who now must flee Missouri if they need abortion services.

There’s some irony in the fact that Louisiana’s new law is fervently supported by the same conservative movement that has turned school board meetings into culture-war battlefields over books and curriculum.

They argue that teaching racial history or gender issues in schools strays from legitimate education and into the realm of cultural indoctrination. But it’s OK to force religious belief (and, in fact, one specific version of religious belief) into every classroom?

They should consider this: Most Americans, even fervent religious believers, presumably wouldn’t support forcing Americans by law to send their kids to church.

Yet if this law stands, every public school student in Louisiana will face what amounts to a daily religious sermon — whether they (or their parents) like it or not.

©2024 STLtoday.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.