Entertainment

/

ArcaMax

Review: 'Cats: The Jellicle Ball' in New York gives this musical a whole new ballroom life

Chris Jones, Chicago Tribune on

Published in Entertainment News

NEW YORK — At “Cats: The Jellicle Ball,” an inspired re-imagining from the directors Zhailon Levingston and Bill Rauch of the adored and despised 1981 Andrew Lloyd Webber musical as a ballroom-fueled extravaganza, you get to question your 1980s musical theater kibble and savor it anew.

The kitty party’s on at the Perelman Performing Arts Center at the World Trade Center in New York, but this affair would get a big meow on Broadway if the Lord Lloyd Webber chooses to bless its well-twirled whiskers. The Runway could easily be moved right into Circle on the Square.

Great musicals, heck, great theater, often flow from a really good idea, at once radical and obvious. Here is the central notion: “Cats” doesn’t have to be performed by cats. It can be a metaphor, stupid. A community of outsiders (the world of queer ballroom) that knows loss but also how to celebrate its own diversity and triumphs. And that likes to come out at night.

Kitties prowling the aisle is just so very much your parents’ “Cats,” kids, especially after the disastrous 2019 movie that creeped everyone out with its scary feline CGI. That abomination took down even Taylor Swift.

Ergo, why not turn most of the cats into ballroom queens? Call up André De Shields in a Gandolf-like wig to end all wigs for Old Deuteronomy and turn the show into a performative contest with some nods to “Six the Musical,” even as the production values make half of Broadway look cheap.

Why not, indeed? As I well remember when I first stared, open-mouthed at this show back in 1981, “Cats” was the original concept musical, always set up as a competition for kitty immortality, with only Grizabella headed to the Heaviside Layer to live more of her nine lives. Based on a collection of T.S. Elliot poems featuring cats with different situations and personalities, it was built to be a series of bravura turns from the likes of Rum Tum Tugger (here Sydney James Harcourt), Skimbleshanks (Emma Sofia), Macavity (Antwayn Hopper), Mungojerrie (Jonathan Burke) and house mother Jennyanydots (Xavier Reyes), newly choreographed with pizzazz and panache by Arturo Lyons and Amari Wiles.

 

In this version, which begins with a DJ (Capital Kaos) blowing the dust off some “Cats” original soundtrack vinyl (talk about making some of us feel old) and the audience exhorted to not be trembling kitties as in the show’s past but participatory party cats, the show becomes a tribute to New York’s drag and queer ballroom history, even replete with vintage footage of lost ancestors, providing Act 2 with some striking emotional oomph.

The show operates around a runway with De Shields’ regal self sitting, Simon Cowell-like, in the seat of judgment. This entire conceit is a gift for a costume designer, of course, but even allowing for that, Qween Jean knocks it out of the litter box, time after time after time. The wigs alone cry for a Tony.

This is obviously not the first deconstruction of a classic Broadway title, but what makes this one different from say, the very chilly Daniel Fish “Oklahoma!” or the recent inuring “Cabaret,” is that this “Cats” doesn’t shock or confront but meets audience members of different ages and persuasions wherever they may land. (Rauch, especially, has a long history of knowing how to include everyone.) The show, sexy throughout, comes off as a celebration of love and resilience, timeless Broadway themes long proven to work with middle America. and what is yet more impressive (and, frankly, surprising) is how much crew actually respects the material.

You read that right. They respect “Cats.” They dignify “Cats.” They elevate “Cats,” and certainly make it work for a new moment where queens now sit on thrones unimaginable in 1981.

...continued

swipe to next page

©2024 Chicago Tribune. Visit chicagotribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus