World Health Organization urges Trump to reconsider exit

Ashleigh Furlong, Bloomberg News on Jan 21, 2025

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

The World Health Organization called on the U.S. to reconsider President Donald Trump’s decision to exit the agency, suggesting the move could undermine global health security.

The planned departure would leave the WHO scrambling to replace its top donor, which contributed $1.3 billion to the organization between 2022 and 2023. Without U.S. funding, work that the WHO carries out on containing diseases such as HIV, polio and Ebola as well as a recent outbreak of lethal Marburg virus could be at risk.

“Together, we ended smallpox, and together we have brought polio to the brink of eradication,” the United Nations agency said Tuesday. “WHO plays a crucial role in protecting the health and security of the world’s people, including Americans.”

Trump’s executive order, among a flurry signed Monday in the Oval Office, leaves the WHO with one year to find alternative funding. Traditional donors like Germany and France probably won’t be able to increase their contributions given their financial situations, according to Anders Nordström, a former acting director-general at the agency.

Nordström expects others from Asia and the Middle East to step up and thereby increase their influence on global health. China was quick to express support on Tuesday, with the country’s foreign ministry spokesperson saying that the WHO’s role “should only be strengthened, not weakened.”

The European Union also urged the U.S. to reconsider and called on members to reinforce their commitments.

Based in Geneva, the WHO plays a key role in battling global health threats. Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is currently in Tanzania to help coordinate a response to the outbreak of Marburg virus, a hemorrhagic fever similar to Ebola.

The WHO has been in Trump’s sights for some time. Toward the end of his first term, he tried to pull the US out of the international health body, saying that it deferred too much to the Chinese government in the early days of the coronavirus outbreak and didn’t act quickly enough to contain the disease. The move at the time was widely criticized by both health advocates and Democratic lawmakers, who called it a political maneuver aimed at shifting blame for the administration’s disastrous response to the pandemic.

“World Health ripped us off,” Trump said Monday. “Everybody rips off the United States. It’s not going to happen anymore.”

The WHO’s program budget for 2022-2023 was $6.7 billion. The largest chunks of income are spent on contractors and staff, with emergency operations receiving the most money in terms of strategic operations.

The first impact of the withdrawal will be on the staff seconded to the WHO from US agencies, who will need to return home immediately, said Nina Schwalbe, CEO of advisory firm Spark Street Advisors.

There could also be a financial hit earlier than expected given that the U.S. pays the WHO in arrears, and Trump’s executive order pauses any further funds to the organization, according to Schwalbe. That could mean “immediate shortfalls,” she said.

The WHO has long faced financial challenges as the vast majority given by donors comes through voluntary contributions, which can be allocated to specific programs. Countries agreed in 2022 to gradually increase contributions. The U.S.’s departure might speed up these efforts to reshape the WHO’s financing.

It could also force the WHO into more of a normative role, setting global standards and developing guidelines, according to David Heymann, former WHO assistant director for health security.

The Gates Foundation, another top WHO donor, reiterated its commitment and said the agency “plays a vital role in combating health threats that impact everyone, including Americans.”

There might be criticisms of the WHO including complaints over the bureaucracy surrounding decisions that could lead to improvements at the organization, said Marion Koopmans, head of the Erasmus MC department of viroscience.

“But a downright pull-out really is turning your back to the rest of the world,” she said.

____

(With assistance from Sonja Wind, Naomi Kresge, Jason Gale, Ike Swetlitz, Kevin Whitelaw, Janice Kew and Karoline Kan.)