CHICAGO — When AT&T Illinois boss Paul La Schiazza received an email from the son of Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan asking for a charitable contribution in 2017, he forwarded it immediately to a member of his government relations team with a note that almost reads like a weary sigh.

“Here we go…this will be endless,” La Schiazza wrote about the request from Andrew Madigan. The assistant, Bob Barry, responded, “I suspect the ‘thank you’ opportunities will be plentiful.”

“Yep . . . we are on the friends and family plan now,” La Schiazza replied.

Those words were displayed for jurors at La Schiazza’s bribery trial Monday, where prosecutors allege they show his state of mind in the weeks after Madigan helped shepherd AT&T’s bill ending mandated landline service — known by the acronym COLR — through the General Assembly.

In his donation request, Andrew Madigan made clear that “our good friend Mike McClain” had suggested he reach out to AT&T. McClain, according to prosecutors, was at the center of a scheme to have AT&T funnel payments to former state Rep. Eddie Acevedo, a Madigan ally, to help win the speaker’s support.

In the email exchange shown to jurors, Barry told La Schiazza: “We are…and there is a sensitivity in that office about us going away now that we got COLR. That is something to keep in mind in rest (of) 17 and in 18 regarding budget and profile with the Speakers office.”

La Schiazza responded by noting they still had other pending legislation that would require the speaker’s assistance.

“I will emphasize that to leadership…Especially if we expect to pass a small cell bill,” La Schiazza wrote.

AT&T wound up donating $2,500 to Andrew Madigan’s charity, according to evidence presented in court Monday.

La Schiazza, 66, was charged in an indictment returned by a federal grand jury in October 2022 with conspiracy, federal program bribery and using a facility in interstate commerce to promote unlawful activity. The most serious counts carry up to 20 years in prison if convicted. He has pleaded not guilty and has been free on bond while his case is pending.

La Schiazza’s lawyers contend that what happened was nothing more than the typical relationship building that is necessary in politics, especially when a company is trying to get lawmakers to consider its agenda.

The trial, could wrap up as soon as Tuesday, has offered a sneak peek at evidence that will be presented at Madigan’s own racketeering trial, which kicks off in three weeks.

Earlier Monday, La Schiazza’s attorney, Tinos Diamantatos, had a chance to cross-examine Tom Cullen, a lobbyist and former aide to Speaker Madigan who allegedly acted as the go-between for the payments from AT&T to Acevedo.

Cullen, who was granted a “non-target” letter from the government, testified on direct examination Friday that he was just trying to be a “team player” when he agreed in 2017 to take on Acevedo as an off-the-books consultant as a favor for AT&T, one of his top clients.

But Cullen told the Acevedo was not very pleased with AT&T’s $2,500-a-month offer, even though the job called for little or no work. In fact, Cullen said, after a meeting about the proposal, Acevedo called him and blew his stack.

“He basically said, ‘What the F is goin’ on here? I’m worth more money,’” Cullen testified, adding that his recollection was that Acevedo demanded double what was being offered.

When the prosecutor asked Cullen to use Acevedo’s exact words, Cullen quoted Acevedo as saying, “F— AT&T, they can kiss my ass.’”

Cullen told the jury he never would have hired Acevedo if AT&T hadn’t asked him, citing the Chicago Democrat’s inexperience and penchant for carousing after legislative sessions.

“I didn’t think that he was a serious lobbyist,” Cullen said. “He was brand new, potentially liked to go out and party and drink a lot, so he just wasn’t somebody I wanted to hire.”

On cross, Diamantatos pointed out that even though Cullen was protected by a non-target letter, it was up to the U.S. attorney’s office to determine if that changed — which could be any time.

“Those meetings with the government are pretty intimidating, aren’t they?” Diamantatos asked.

“They’re not fun,” Cullen agreed.

Diamantatos also pointed out repeatedly that there were no emails between Cullen and La Schiazza about the alleged scheme to hire Acevedo, and that Cullen had no direct knowledge that Madigan had requested AT&T hire him.

Cullen testified he knew La Schiazza only casually through the years.

“Would it surprise you to know that between 2015 through 2019, there were zero calls between yourself and my client, Mr. Paul La Schiazza?” Diamantatos asked.

“No,” Cullen responded.

While Cullen was testifying, his former boss, Madigan, was by happenstance appearing in a courtroom five floors below, where U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey was holding a final pretrial conference in Madigan’s case.

____

©2024 Chicago Tribune. Visit at chicagotribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.