From the Left

/

Politics

Is Personal Privacy at Odds with Literary Fame?

Ruth Marcus on

WASHINGTON -- The apparent unmasking of pseudonymous author Elena Ferrante feels like an occasion not for outrage so much as for sadness, and regret at the vanishing space allotted to personal privacy in an age insatiable for celebrity tidbits and fueled by omnipresent technology.

Into this intrusive new world comes Ferrante, who has written a compelling and -- perhaps more energizing to those determined to expose her -- spectacularly successful quartet of novels, set in Naples and recounting the lifelong friendship of two women.

Ferrante's true identity as literary translator Anita Raja was revealed, if the report by Italian investigative journalist Claudio Gatti is correct, the old-school shoe-leather way, with leaks of her publisher's financial records and digging into real estate documents. Yet the author's unavailing plea for anonymity is best understood in the context of the modern world she inhabits, and her effort, ultimately unsuccessful, to resist the invasive force of celebrity culture.

This moment was inevitable. Human nature loves a mystery yet demands its eventual solution. Investigative reporters respond with Pavlovian predictability to the intolerable provocation of the pseudonym.

No matter that the pseudonymous novel has an impressive historical pedigree -- and not just, for those who discern sexism at work in Ferrante's unmasking, when it comes to female authors. No matter that there may be more worthy topics of journalistic enterprise.

Once Ferrante's choice to write under a pseudonym collided with her best-seller status, the hunt was on, the prey certain to be caught. Ask Joe Klein, the once-anonymous author of the roman-a-clef about Bill Clinton. Ask J.K. Rowling, who, post-"Harry Potter," wrote mysteries under the pseudonym Robert Galbraith, albeit for a brief three months, explaining that she sought "totally unvarnished feedback."

Sure, Ferrante assumed this risk, although perhaps she could not have anticipated her fame. Certainly, she tempted fate with the publication of "Frantumaglia," an ostensibly nonfiction pastiche of letters, interviews and other writings in which Ferrante both describes herself (apparently inaccurately) as the daughter of a Neapolitan seamstress and proclaims that she finds lies "useful and I resort to them when necessary."

And, yes, readers of novels as gripping as Ferrante's have a legitimate interest in learning more about their creator. How fascinating that Raja's mother seems actually to have been a teacher, Golda Frieda Petzenbaum, born in Germany to a family of Polish Jews. Her mother's story of wartime survival, refugee camps and eventual reconciliation with her parents, sounds like fertile fodder for fiction. How interesting, how astonishing given their gritty, pinpoint realism, that the author chose instead to ground her novels in postwar Naples, where Raja was born but did not grow up.

It is not mere window-peeping prurience for a reader to crave more about an author's background. A 2003 letter to Ferrante from her publisher, included in "Frantumaglia," cited "a healthy desire on the part of your readers ... to know you better."

 

And yet there is an equally healthy, even laudable, desire on the part of the author to shield herself from public view. For Ferrante, at least, pseudonymity was not a gimmick but a given, essential to her self-conception. She warned her publisher in 1991, before the release of her first novel, that she would engage in no public activities to promote it -- no conferences, no prize ceremonies, no television circuit.

"I will be interviewed only in writing, but I would prefer to limit even that to the indispensable minimum," Ferrante wrote. "I believe that books, once they are written, have no need of their authors. If they have something to say, they will sooner or later find readers; if not, they won't."

How endearingly quaint. In the modern understanding, the book not only needs the author, it needs the full publicity tour, and the website, and the reading group guide. Most authors demand the full panoply of such promotion; Ferrante recoiled from it, despite the expected economic detriment.

This attitude is remarkable not only for its departure from the publishing norm, but for its resistance to the cult of celebrity and the accompanying demands for an all-access pass to all manner of personal information. Relentless self-promotion and self-exposure have yielded a plague of Kardashians, Real Housewives and, yes, Donald Trump.

And what intimate details celebrities, both real and famous-for-being-famous, may be reluctant to divulge are increasingly vulnerable to technological intrusion. The drone buzzes the celebrity wedding, snapping photos. The hacker unearths private emails, or posts intimate photographs.

Ferrante stood as a conscientious objector to all this. That she ultimately failed should come as no surprise, but it is cause for reflection, and for lament.

========

Ruth Marcus' email address is ruthmarcus@washpost.com.


Copyright 2016 Washington Post Writers Group

 

 

Comics

Bart van Leeuwen Mike Smith Jack Ohman Gary McCoy David M. Hitch Al Goodwyn